The Institutional KS project is suggesting and looking for feedback on a framework for action that has two main objectives:
This is an initial attempt which should be fine-tuned over the next months through:
Rational
Knowledge sharing and organizational development
We argue that institutional KS is to be analyzed and developed as an integral part of organizational development. Organizational development “is the process through which an organization develops the internal capacity to most efficiently and effectively provide its mission work and to sustain itself over the long term. “ (see Wikipedia).
Organizational development takes place in a constant interaction between Power (decision making and effectiveness managed from the top) and Empowerment (processes that allow us to gain the knowledge, skill-sets and attitude needed to cope with and influence the changing world and the organizational circumstances in which we evolve). We also argue that organizational development is unfolding in a constant effort to the cope with the duality between Complexity and organizational Effectiveness. Complexity is increasing by the scientific research problematic itself, the scope, and the geographical spread and cultural diverse teams that are involved nowadays in our research work to mention only a couple, and Effectiveness is a condition for sustainability. Power, Empowerment, Complexity, and Effectiveness are main pillars and challenges in the path towards beneficial and positive organizational development and are represented in an axes chart (see below).
4 interrelated fields of action

The left side of the axes is the area of organizational development that deals with transformative issues; the right side is the area that deals with practical aspects of organizational development.
The circle around the four components reflects their constant interaction; they are all essential to organizational development. We can for example state that: Empowerment which is based on the acknowledgement of organizational complexity and which benefits from management support and participatory decision making processes leads most probably to organizational effectiveness. We could also say: An organization that empowers its personnel but does not manage a momentum of decision-making is going to reach levels of complexity that are difficult to handle and are getting in the way of effectiveness.
A framework for Institutional KS project activities
Within this suggested framework, the activities of the Institutional KS project can be clustered as follows:
Dear Simone – I very much welcome the initiatives that are described, and look forward to following closely on the one related to emabedding KS in a strategic framework. One suggestion on the chart – it contradicts the text which says: ‘Power, Empowerment, and Complexity are three main pillars and challenges in the path towards organizational Effectiveness’ – could the chart perhaps be reworked to reflect this reality better? Best, Andrea.
Hi Andrea,
I very much like the pioint you made and changed the text to hopefully translate the idea more consistantly: “Power, Empowerment, Complexity, and Effectiveness are main pillars and challenges in the path towards beneficial and positive organizational development and are represented in an axes chart (see below).” This is the kind of feedback that I am lloking for to improve the concept. Thank you so much!